SAN ANTONIO – The San Antonio City Council batted down Mayor Gina Ortiz Jones’ attempt to get the city’s funding for a downtown Spurs arena onto the November ballot in a 5-6 vote Monday morning.
Unlike the county’s $311 million share of funding, which roughly 52% of voters approved last November, the city’s $489 million proposed financing does not require a similar vote. It is an option, though, and Jones made a last-minute push to get it onto the ballot.
Recommended Videos
Jones, Jalen McKee-Rodriguez (D2), Edward Mungia (D4), Teri Castillo (D5), and Ric Galvan (D6) voted in favor of putting it onto the ballot.
Sukh Kaur (D1), Phyllis Viagran (D3), Marina Alderete Gavito (D7), Ivalis Meza Gonzalez (D8), Misty Spears (D9) and Marc Whyte (D10) voted against it.
Though she and her supporters on the issue — many with their own misgivings about the project — think city voters deserve a separate vote for the city funding, a majority of the council want the project to push ahead and argued last year’s election on the county portion was sufficient to show voters’ wider approval for the project.
“I’m having a little bit of déjà vu because I feel like this room was built exactly the same way — two sides, August 21st last year — and we were litigating this exact same discussion and nothing has changed, actually, about this deal,” said Kaur, referring to the council’s vote on the proposed arena funding deal.
Monday was the deadline to get the issue onto the November ballot, and it appears to largely pave the way for the city to negotiate a final deal with Spurs Sports and Entertainment (SS&E), which is expected to happen later this year. The team is expected to pay the remaining $500 million of the estimated $1.3 billion arena cost.
The city’s $489 million share of the funding would come from bonds backed by four sources of revenue: the Spurs’ lease of the publicly owned arena, private developers’ lease of nearby city-owned land, property tax from that development within a specific area known as the Hemisfair Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ), and hotel-related state taxes from a “Project Finance Zone” (PFZ).
Opponents of another vote argued that the money is either restricted in how it can be used or relies on the project moving ahead in the first place.
The vote’s outcome was not a surprise; a majority of council members publicly voiced their opposition shortly after Jones floated her idea in a July 31 memo. Still, Jones held a series of public “listening sessions,” and pushed ahead with bringing the issue up in Monday’s special council meeting.
Jones didn’t speak much from the dais ahead of the vote, but posted afterward on social media “I will always fight to ensure our community has more of a say in how their money is spent, not less. They deserve that.”
People from both sides filled council chambers for more than two hours of public comment. Members of the business community and the Spurs organization generally spoke in large groups against holding another vote, while many of those in favor spoke on their own.
“This is not anti-Spurs. This is not anti-downtown. This is not anti-development. This is responsible citizenship,” said Graciela Sanchez, the head of the Esperanza Peace and Justice Center.
R.C. Buford, CEO of SS&E, claimed the Spurs generated $165 million spent in the community during their spring post-season run, which former Spurs player Sean Elliott said had strangers high-fiving each other and everyone wanting to talk about “our” team.
“So now is not the time for complacency. Now is the time to build on that energy,” Elliott said. “Thriving downtown. Real opportunity to revitalize the Eastside. Hotels, restaurants, small businesses filled with people coming together not just for Spurs games, but for concerts, conventions, big time sporting events, college football and cultural games. That’s right there within our reach.”
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.